top of page
Search
Writer's picturemcs4597xlens Michelle Crawford-Sapenter

8th Circuit Court Strikes Down Voting Rights Act Clause


NATION: Today, a US potentially forbidding circuit court overturned laws protecting the rights of voters against discrimination on the basis of race. The 15th Amendments Voting Rights Laws sought to provide for the rights of the black voter during the protested anti bellum era that extended from the Deep South. In 1965, the movement the created the overturning of rulings that prevented black voters from exercising their voting rights with the acceptance by the lower federal regions of the United States.


By Anne M Erbynstein.


The clause describing the right of voters according to the NVRA states that "a person who is aggrieved by a violation” of this law can follow certain steps and, if needed, file a federal lawsuit to address any violations.'


Today, the adjustments made in the US Voting Rights Act overturns the standard set by civil rights leaders of the who plowed down the thicket that grew up to clutter the path of tge black voter and lead more than black voter, but included those who are not black and, yet, the poorer American become situated under the "minority" label.


In a court in (), today, the established law that eoukd oust the right of average citizens bringing law suits under Section 2 ofthe VRA. The courts decision would authorize the Attorney General only, as having the right to bring a law suit in response to allegations of discrimination involving any claims in voting map re-districting.


As the 8th Cirvuit Court established a new law, tge court states that a private group has only the authority to bring a law suit under such legal condition referred to as the private cause of action.


Aside from assuming a private right or cause of action --a right afforded a plaintiff when an act of negligence is claimed. The CfA, must then, satisfy any questions associated with 1) a duty or standard of care recognized by law, (2) a breach of that duty or failure to exercise reasonable care, (3) causation resulting from said breach resulting in (4) some harm to the plaintiff.


There exists, however, one caveat associated with the 8th Circuit Court decision-- that being the laws established in the National Voting Registration Act which authorizes the Federal Election Commission which gives states the authority to determine and establish that which may be necessary for voters involving mail in voter registration and to compile reports on the effectiveness of the NVRA.


Decided by Congress, a private right for action can be either implied if explicit in its determining who and how a federal law suit may be brought.


The final decision by tge 8th Circuit Court provides that the US Department of Justice is limited in the area of time and resources. Under the current U.S. DoJ, Attorney General Merrick Garland, 8 voting rights redistricting law suits have been filed, each of which remain oending.


While DoJ law suits remain pending, there are voters in a community of 6 states among those regarded as ' minority' who will suffer the worst impact of the 8th Curvuit Court decision.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Σχόλια

Βαθμολογήθηκε με 0 από 5 αστέρια.
Δεν υπάρχουν ακόμη βαθμολογίες

Προσθέστε μια βαθμολογία
bottom of page