NATION: Msking clear the impression taken from the actions involving the attack on the Capitol building, 2021, the US Supreme Court () heard the , albeit, reticent cry of a federal court judge who made it clear the former President Donald Trump is, regarded as unfit to run for the office presidency.. Federal Judge , Michael Luttig, in spoke before the Supreme Court following his testimony my before the Hoyse Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection.
By Michelle Crawford-Sapenter
"Trump incited, and therefore engaged in, an armed insurrection against the Constitution’s express and foundational mandates that require the peaceful transfer of executive power to a newly-elected President."-- Retired Judge Luttig commented
Today, retired Judge Luttig commented in regard to the Capitol insurrection stating that the weight of the secession by South Carolina that stemmed the outbreak ofthe Civil War was no match for the Trump-leaning entourage that attacked the Capitol building on January 6, 2021
Today, Luttig stated that Trump disqualified himself by means of inciting one of the most violent acts of sedition ever known to transpire in United States government and on its grounds.
Acting as a friend- ofthe -court, Michael Luttig spoke in regard to Article 3 ofthe U.S. Constitution stating that the actions taken by the former President to intercept and interrupt the " peaceful transfer of executive power..."
According to Luttig, tge actions that are contended by Trump represent a measure of unfairness to US voters because they would possibly place a vote for someone who has no legal right bore liberty to run following the violation of the U.S. Constitution Insurrrction Ban.
Trump attempts to argue that the Insurrection Ban may only be enforced by the US Congress one an official has been election. The Capitol attack transpiring after the 2020 General election and during such time the already elected official was being confirmed, it may seem clear that Joe Biden , then, President-"elect," had been elected.
Comments