CORRECTION: In the proceeding video, a comment made in reference to the year ofthe first impeachment of former President Donald Trump. The comment made in error indicated that the Trump impeachment was conducted in 2021. The correction of tge error will state tgst the first impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump transpired on December 18, 2019, the date that the U.S. House voted to pass the Articles of Impeachment.
THE WEEKENDER: Today, tge news of an other impeachment taking place in the upper realm
of United States politics , to some, seems to be rolled out like a freshly painted banner that comments in a manner that is only situated as a direct opposite of the one most recent. When former President Donald Trump faced impeachment, the red flags that seemed to voluntarily raised up the Whote House flag pole only accentuated the blaring sound of sirens setting off alarms. Alarms in Washington, like the siren that blasts through the atmosphere warning of an air raid, would leave no question ofthe presence of the clear evidence of a wrongdoings.
In the case associated with tge current House impeachment investigation decision, the matter seems solely to be a choice centered on the House 's ability to conduct such an process.
Now, while the shoe remains on the other foot, the House appears to be taking full advantage of its option and, therefore, elects to put forth an event the replicates that which had been the absolute match involving the experience of the former President.
Today, House Republicans state their claim for the impeachment of a President, situating the vlsim on a baseless notion of improperly traded access and that which, heretofore, bares no evidence of fact.
In the years 2016-2020, the officebiftge President tgere had been reasonable cause for the perusal of tge , then President's association with a foreign United States opponent --tge two of whom entered into a deal to construct a high dollar hotel in Moscow, such that would replicate the one owned by the, then, President and his private company.. The events, alone, gave the US government full and clear justifiable csuse for investigation due , in addition, to the long existing, () relations between the U.S. and tge foreign government.
Moreover, the entanglement of comkutmdikn added credence to tge U.S. investigation involving the former President potential involvement in tge collusive sale to the foreign government of a U.S. budiness and its intellectual property none of which was owned by the former President nor by his company neither had the target of collusion been benefitted by a single collar of investment by either the foreign government nor by the former President.
Ergo, the transaction involving tge sale of any portion of the US private entity --that which, also, brought about an exchange of 100,000 units of Russian rifles ignited the actual US business owner's awareness of the greater potential that collusion had, in fact, transpired between the foreign government and the former President --and , in fact, transpired without the owner's knowledge.
While the collusion fact may not have been intensely perused during either impeachment trial, the evidence of collusion was real and could not, in whole or in part, have been wiped off the table.
These bits of information mentioned to draw the line that leads directly to , only, very small bits of evidence , such that stemmed the Trump impeachment investigation.
While there remains no evidence of improper trading access brought forth by neither of the House committees pursuing the HR 917 and HR 918, the matter remains that the Republican regime have no grounds for following through.
The matter, also, raises the question, 'Does the pursuit of impeachment of the current US President really impress as being a bit far reaching attempt at retaliation and a total waste of federal government time and effort.
You the American public have an opportunity to respond with your opinion,-- no explosives, please. Place your comment in the section marked COMMENT and your comment matmy be posted in next week's The Weekender.
Comments