top of page
Search
Writer's picturemcs4597xlens Michelle Crawford-Sapenter

US Supreme Court Rescinds Freedom of Religion Act, 1993 Citing Statutory Abuses

Updated: Jun 25


NATION: Today, the US Supreme Court handed down a decision that has overturned the former 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The decision made by the Supreme Court sets limitations on a law that had been exploited within the realm of religious practices. Today the Supreme Court’s decision focuses on the abuses of the RFRA that involves members of the world of religioun’s using their fsith as a reason for the evasion of vaccinations and immunization.


By Michelle Crawford-Sapenter.


Today, the decision made by tge US suoreme Vourt opens a major frontier for Congress to redevelop the statutes that involve the manner by which religion can play a dominant role in decision made involving their’s and their loved one’s health and well being.


The Suoreme Court’s decided that the former 1993 devision suoerceded limits that would, therefore, violate the principles of separation of power. Today, the Supreme Court indicated that the 1993 RFRA handed down an order within statutes that resulted in such violations that upset the balance of power.


According to recent observations of the U.S. Supreme Court’s arrival at the reliance on a definitive statement describing religion, the court indicates that there has been no clear distinction made between religion, personal practices and morality.


In August, 2023 when tge US Supreme Court received a case involving the church and a petition against the decisions made by the U.S. Supreme Court, the church argued that the constitutionality of the RFRA supported the church’s requirement for strict scrutiny in practicing its rules. Despite the church’s pleadings, the Supreme Court’s decision today, upheld the 1993 RFRA case stating that the law acted in violation of the U.S. Constitution.


The Supreme Court did acknowledge the Free Exercise and Free Speech clause from government scrutiny the personal practice of religious freedoms. The Supreme Vourt states that tge RFRA ,1993 law is unconstitutional for reasons associated with the unconstitutional act by government to suppress or support any expression of religion.





















0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page