NATION: In the months that have progressed following the double impeachment of former President Donald Trump, there is no question that Trump and attorneys have sought after a status that, if returning at any point, to the White House, the return would ensure the absolute immunity of the seated president.
By Michelle Crawford-Sapenter
Chief Justice Robert’s ruled in regard to presidential immunity stating that “for conduct within his exclusive sphere of constitutional authority, official acts …” are situated within the realm of presidential immunity. Robert’s, therein, also, excluding from executive immunity “unofficial criminal acts.”
Last week, in a white arbitrary and unprecedented decision, Chief Justice John Robert’s granted former President ; the US presidency, total immunity. In the judgement passed by the Chief Justice Robert’s, the US Supreme Court grants the US president the leeway to commit any act of crime including such acts that violate the U.S. Constitution. Justice Robert’s, thereby acted in a manner to abandon all obligations assigning the US Supreme Court to serve as the guardian ofthe US government and its laws.
“We had a revolution to get rid of [the] kingly prerogative and the supreme court just reinstituted it. This emboldens any president to indulge his baser instincts. Secure in their ability to avoid criminal responsibility and confident in the supine nature of Congressional impeachment oversight, they will be willing to push to the edge of permissible conduct and beyond.”— Judiciary Scholar, Paul Rosensweig
Today, former US Justice department officials and scholars of juris prudence has entered a viable argument stating that the recent U.S. high court’s decision renders total immunity stating that the office of the President is above the law. Scholars and former department of justice officials have stated that the SCOTUS decision is dangerous.
According to the experts, Robert’s decision is meant to exact total reversals that arrive at Trump’s exoneration involving some four felony indictments that included charges filed against the former President in 2020.
The Robert’s ruling, according to experts , thereby, exonerates Trump on , at least one of the four federal indictment charges currently faced by the former President.
While the statement made by US Supreme Court Justice Dtomeyor suggests that Robert’s decision would simply render the office of US Presidency as an office ofa “ king…” if Trump returned to office. Others among US judiciary experts state that the SCOTUS decision “ emboldens …” Trump and any other president who would be empowered to impose arbitrary rules outside of the statutes confined to being followed by every elected official who is charged with upholding the tenets ofthe U.S. Constitution.
The results of the recent SCOTUS rulings , such that are extremists in their impact against the laws that support the high gourmet’s obligation to acting as guardian of the US government.
In the recent hours, US President Joe Biden has proposed a plan that will impose reforms on the U.S. Supreme Court to limit its arbitrary and extremist decision making which, in the most recent 8 years, has resulted I. final calls THST approve and exonerate from criminal indictment charges former President Donald Trump.
Comments